In Jane Austen and the English Landscape, Mavis Batey considers that it was important that Darcy’s home reflected his true nature. She suggests that Jane Austen thought a great deal about Pemberley and had a clear plan of the house in her mind. Perhaps, Batey notes, Cassandra may even have drawn her sister a sketch of the imagined landscape.
She suggests that Pemberley was modelled on Chatsworth, the home of the Duke of Devonshire because she placed Pemberley in the vicinity of Bakewell although, as Batey points out ‘Darcy was no Duke of Devonshire and Chatsworth could not be kept up on even £10,000 a year’. - Country Houses in Jane Austen's Novels
This article in the Victorian Web Nineteenth Century Household Staff discusses how many servants it would take to run a townhouse or a country estate, and the minimum costs involved in 1857. Also read: The Assistance of Servants: Jane Austen Centre Magazine
- First image: Chatsworth
- Second image: Wilton House interior as Pemberley
- Third image of Wrotham Park, Norland, Sense and Sensibility 2008
I don't even want to spoil the image in my mind by reading those articles. What fiction provides for my mental escapes is better than shooting down my balloon. Ha Ha
ReplyDelete**fingers in ear** La-la-la; I can't hear you! I think I've seen this home too often as Pemberley and can't imagine anything less for Darcy.
ReplyDeleteI've always wondered about this. . . I especially love the "cottage" that the Dashwoods live in S&S 95. It is much more than I would have imagined!
ReplyDeleteWe suspend disbelief for the movies. This is FICTION. The elegance of the set helps showcase the characters and relationship. This time, I just went with it. There are other times when the obvious disparity between income and residence would distract me.
ReplyDeleteA wonderful thought to consider! Our imaginations long to take flight when it comes to Pemberley. A dose of reality can do us no harm as fancy will surely prevail in the long run.
ReplyDeleteWho cares about reality where Darcy is involved...?
ReplyDelete